Life After St. Marys: Alum Confronts America’s War on Drugs

Alcohol  Intervention
Live Chat with AIR
  
 
Search Site: 

Life After St. Marys: Alum Confronts America’s War on Drugs

By Andrew T. Wainwright
Featured in the St. Mary's College of Maryland
River Gazette

November, 2007

Andrew T. Wainwright is a national expert on addiction and intervention. He is the co-founder of Addiction Intervention Resources (AIR) and the co-author of the book It’s Not Okay to Be a Cannibal - How to Stop Addiction from Eating Your Family Alive.

I am sometimes asked, “So, how do you feel about the War on Drugs?”
Part of my answer is that I am one of the foot-soldiers in a war on drugs. I have dedicated my life to helping families through the difficulties of addiction. I find nothing cute or fashionable about drugs and alcohol. I absolutely take a very tough line on getting people free of substances that don’t enlighten, entertain, or improve a human being, but which only fool them into thinking they do these things – only, ultimately, to kill both body and soul.

Having said all this, I have serious issues with the official, government-driven War on Drugs. The War on Drugs is into its fourth decade now, having begun in the Nixon administration. Over that time it has used the power of government in just about every way to stem the flow of drugs into our country and into our loved ones and ourselves. But there has been plenty of bad to go along with the good. Without a doubt, we have focused the combined power and intelligence of local, state, federal, and international criminal justice systems on stopping the importation, sale, and use of drugs. It is also true that we have spent hundreds of millions of dollars on public awareness programs, using TV, radio, the print media, and in-school programs to stress the dangers posed by drugs. We have poisoned marijuana fields in Mexico, blighted the cocaine plantations of Colombia and Bolivia, and set fire to the poppy fields of Afghanistan.

But what about the other side? We have imprisoned tens of thousands of our citizens – with the idea that there will be no access to drugs in the penal system. Back in 1980, almost 600,000 Americans were arrested for drug use. By 2003, that figure was almost triple, 1,678,200. We arrest more people for drugs than for murder, manslaughter, rape, and assault combined. A generation of kids has grown up with one or both parents in jail for drugs. After all this effort, what has been the effect on drug use here and in other countries? The shorter answer is that it has gone up.

I believe that the War on Drugs, fully capitalized, is itself a form of addictive behavior – in which we quest for something unattainable, endlessly repeat a behavior known to be extremely injurious, and ultimately never get what we want.

Recovering addicts talk frequently about the definition of insanity when describing addiction. “This time if I use cocaine, it will be like that first hit. It will feel great, and I won’t have any consequences, even though the past 100 times I have said this it has not been the case.” Is this wishful thinking or pure insanity? If you know that something doesn’t work but keep repeating the behavior, that’s insanity. Likewise, a War on Drugs that seriously harms thousands of families but, for the most part, doesn’t succeed in discouraging drug use is, as addicts use the word, insane.

Telling an addict to “Just say no” is asking for scorn. If addicts could stop on their own, they certainly would. No one wants to grow up to disappoint their parents, lie, cheat, steal, and become the best addict they can be, but it happens all the time. By definition, active addicts aren’t able to not use drugs. Has interdiction abroad caused the inflow of drugs to significantly diminish? Has the threat of jail helped the addict overcome desire? Have all the public service announcements caused addicts to stop using? Too often the answer is no.

The War on Drugs simply doesn’t work because it is a creature of bureaucracy, a million light years from where drugs are consumed and harm actually occurs, in the bedrooms and basements of ordinary families.

Instead of a B-1 bomber approach to addiction, flying 30,000 feet above the action, the need is for something much smaller in scale, more personal, more focused. Think of a different kind of war, one that is fought entirely on the ground. One that consists of hand-to-hand combat, house-to-house fighting in which families confront their loved ones, eyeball to eyeball, telling them the truth that everyone has been too afraid to utter. Whereas the War on Drugs is wholesale, this kind of fighting is retail. Where the government’s war is distant and remote, this war is as close as the sofa in your living room.

I suspect that we as a society indulge in the wholesale, B-1 bomber approach out of cowardice. It’s psychically easier to confront drug addiction on a high-altitude, impersonal basis. It’s terrifying to look into the eyes of a son or a daughter or a spouse and say: “I won’t tolerate your addiction anymore. Things are going to change.”

We are so deep into addiction as a people that we can no longer think straight. We have had to make room for insanity in our lives and to pretend that the natural response to life’s difficulties is to get high, to escape, to create little shrines to our specialness. Our world is so insane that tens of millions of people feel safer and more like themselves when they are living criminal existences in which they turn their backs on the humble values that have held human society together over the last hundred thousand years: trust, respect, gratitude, joy, and perspective on who we are and what our place is in this world. In the place of these simple values, the addict substitutes alcohol, speed, pot, and frantic compulsivity.

So what are we to do? How should the War on Drugs be fought? The war on drugs must start in the home, moving from family to family, supporting one another. We must speak out, get involved, work for change. The downside of doing nothing is death. The upside of intervening, on both the personal and institutional levels, is the possibility of possibility.

 

Click here to link directly to the PDF version of this article.

 

CLICK HERE to read more information on addiction-related crisis interventions or call our National Call Center 800.561.8158

 

Office Locations
Key Staff
Media Coverage
Job Openings
What's New with AIR?
 

Life After St. Marys: Alum Confronts America’s War on Drugs